Supreme Court of India. T. Sivasubramaniam & Ors vs Kasinath Pujari & Ors on 31 August, 1999. Author: V Khare. Bench: V.N.Khare, S.N.Phukan. PETITIONER: T. SIVASUBRAMANIAM & ORS. Vs. RESPONDENT: KASINATH PUJARI & ORS. ... It is against the said judgment of the High Court the landlord is in appeal before us.

 · App. 1—List of Cases of Supreme Court of India, 2011 243 Sl. No. Party Name Act/Legislation Referred Citation 28. Suresh Dhanuka v. Sunita Mohapatra (02.12.2011) Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Sections 9 & 17. 2011(3) SCALE 315. Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958.

(a) assert the supremacy of the Constitution and the sovereignty of the people of Kenya; (b) provide authoritative and impartial interpretation of the Constitution; (c) develop rich jurisprudence that respects Kenya's history and traditions and facilitates its social, economic and political growth;

 · A pujari who conducts worship at a temple is not merely, by offering worship to the idol, elevated to the status of a shebait (manager of the temple), the Ayodhya judgment of the Supreme Court has ...

Get free access to the complete judgment in Obayya Pujary And Ot... v. Member Secretary, Ka... on CaseMine.

 · in 2011, the kerala high court, by a common judgement on a writ petition filed by the successor of the last ruler, held that the petitioner, uthradom thirunal marthanda varma, the then-maharaja, or any successor of his family, could not claim control or management of the temple under section 18 (2) of the travancore-cochin hindu religious …

 · No. 7 Supreme Court 2011 2 THE SUPREME COURT ACT, 2011 No. 7 of 2011 ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS Section PART I—PRELIMINARY 1— Short title. 2—Interpretation. 3—Object of the Act. PART II—ADMINISTRATION OF THE SUPREME COURT 4—Vacancy not to affect jurisdiction. 5—Order of precedence of judges of the …

 · issues raised under and in terms of rule 58.8(2) of the Rules of the Court of Session 1994. 4. On 8 January 2010, after a debate that took place over periods totalling 22 days, the Lord Ordinary (Lord Emslie) held that the appellants had locus standi to bring these proceedings, that the wording of Rule of Court 58.8(2) was wide

This is an appeal against the judgment of the Court of Appeal, Benin Division in appeal NO. CA/B/28/97 delivered on 4/4/2001 in which it set aside the judgment of the trial court delivered on 22nd Sepview more: Sylvester Umaru Onu, Umaru Atu Kalgo, George Adesola Oguntade, Mahmud Mohammed, Walter Nkanu Onnoghen: 07-04 …

 · Judgment date 20 August 2015 Title Nyakaana v National Environment Management Authority and Ors (Constitutional Appeal 5 of 2011) [2015] UGSC 14 (20 August 2015); Cite this case [2015] UGSC 14 Short summary: Constitutional Law, Constitutional Interpretation, Have his cause heard (fair trial), HR THE REPUBLIC OF …

 · The Supreme Court in State of Maharashtra v. H. N. Rao, AIR 1970 SC 1157, held that the reasonable restriction imposed has to be adjudged in the light of the nature …

2  · Sr. No. Case Subject Case No Case Title Author Judge Upload Date Judgment Date Citation(s) SCCitation(s) Download

 · Sr. No. Case Subject Case No Case Title Author Judge Judgment Date Upload Date Citation SC Citation Download

Supreme Court jurisdiction . The Supreme Court jurisdiction is set out under Articles 58(5), 163(3), (4), (5) &(6), 168(8) of the Constitution and Sections 12, 13, 15, 29 and 40 of the Supreme Court Act No. 7 of 2011 Laws of Kenya, as follows, to:-Exclusively hear and determine disputes relating to the Presidential elections.

Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:

2  · 25 Most Important Supreme Court Judgements. Case. Relevance. A.K. Gopalan Case (1950) SC contented that there was no violation of Fundamental Rights enshrined in Articles 13, 19, 21 and 22 under the provisions of the Preventive Detention Act, if the detention was as per the procedure established by law. Here, the SC took a narrow view …

Supreme Court of Japan 4-2 Hayabusa-cho, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo 102-8651 JAPAN Phone: (81)-(0)3-3264-8111

 · Judgments. Supreme Court decisions are published via NSW Caselaw. Decisions are also reproduced on AustLii. This collection includes historical judgments handed down before 1900. If you are unable to find an electronic version of a judgment, you can complete the " Application for copy of reasons for judgment " form. Registry staff will …

 · Supreme Court: Bench of Hemant Gupta and A.S. Bopanna, JJ., while addressing the matter pertaining to rights of the priest, observed that: "Pujari is only to perform puja and to maintain the properties of the deity." "…name of the Collector as manager cannot be recorded in respect of property vested in the deity as the Collector …

 · (2) The procedure for applying for judgment in default of appearance or service of defence will be by way of filing a Request to enter judgment in Form 79A together with the judgment in Form 79 of Appendix A to the Rules of Court. Solicitors' attention is drawn to Order 13, Rule 7 (1) and Order 19, Rule 8A of the Rules of Court, which state:

This agreement provided that it was to form a part of the terms and conditions of employment set out in the defendant's employees' contracts of employment. This collective bargaining agreement had separate and distinct provisions on summary dismissal and on termination. Clause 40, on termination, states as follows: " 40.

 · 33 as a preliminary point, it must be noted that, in paragraph 51 of the judgment of 24 november 2011, scarlet extended (c‑70/10, eu:c:2011:771), which concerned inter alia the interpretation of the same directive, the court held essentially that the ip addresses of internet users were protected personal data because they allow users to be …

 · The term "opinions," as used here, refers to several types of writing by the Justices. The most well known are the opinions of the Court announced in cases in which the Court has heard oral argument. Each sets out the Court's judgment and its reasoning. The Justice who authors the majority or principal opinion summarizes the opinion from …

JANUARY 2011. 1. State of Kerala vs Raneef (January 3, 2011) 2. Brij Mohan & Ors. Vs. Haryana Urban Development Authority & ANR (January 3, 2011) 3. Jagat Singh Vs State …

1  · Correspondence The Registrar, Supreme Court of India, Tilak Marg, New Delhi-110001 e-mail : supremecourt[at]nic[dot]in Contact Details : 011-23116400, 23116401, …

 · [Rev. 2012] No. 7 of 2011 Supreme Court 5 [Issue 1] NO. 7 OF 2011 SUPREME COURT ACT [Date of assent: 22nd June, 2011.] [Date of commencement: 23rd June, 2011.] An Act of Parliament to make further provision with respect to the operation of the Supreme Court pursuant to Article 163(9) of the Constitution, and for connected purposes

 · Judgment date Neutral citation Case ID Case name; 14 Dec 2011 [2011] UKSC 60: UKSC 2011/0007: Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (Appellant) v Payne and …

SUPREME COURT SAKALA, C.J., MWANAMWAMBWA, AND MUYOVWE, JJS., 7th DECEMBER, 2010 and 8th APRIL, 2011. (S.C.Z. Judgment No. 7 of 2011) [1] Employment Law - Dismissal and termination - Distinction thereof This was an appeal against the judgment of the Industrial Relations Court.

1. M. Nagabhushana Vs State of Karnataka & Others (February 01, 2011) 2. B.A. Umesh Vs. Regr. Gen. High Court of Karnataka (February 01, 2011) 3. Kolla Veera Raghav Rao Vs Gorantla Venkateswara Rao & ANR.

Read More. the karnataka stone crusher rules 2012 . supreme court judgement on karnataka stone crusher. obayya pujari supreme court judgement 2011.Specify distance …

Get free access to the complete judgment in Pobbati Obayya v. Amilineni Chinna Venkatappa . on CaseMine.

 · 09:29 PM, 06 Sep 2021. Read Time: 07 minutes. In a significant Judgment upholding Deity's rights, Supreme Court on Monday observed that the presiding deity of the temple is the owner of the land attached to the temple, not the pujari (priest). Court upheld the circulars issued by the Madhya Pradesh Government seeking to delete names of …

 · stone crushers in karnataka closed obayya poojari Minevik. stone crushers in karnataka closed obayya poojari. 2013, obayya poojary's case, which were issued in …